◦ Prompt · Scout

Give Your AI Agent a Scout — From Hard-Coded Prompts to Operator-Tunable Doctrine in One Session

Paste this into Claude Code, Cursor, or Aider and it'll walk your agent codebase through building a scheduled scout sub-agent: a research loop that ends in a validated structured report, an evidence-first rubric with explicit hard kills, rotating hunting lanes that change what it looks for by the day, a review pipeline where a human decides and the agent never does, and — the part almost everyone skips — an instruction set that lives in editable documents your operator can retune from the UI with override, revert, version history and hot reload, instead of a Python constant nobody can reach without a deploy. Interview first, then build tier by tier. Each tier ships independently with verification.

Aug 25, 2026agentsub-agentsscheduled-agentsprompt-managementstructured-outputclaude-apianthropic-sdktutorial

◦ 4,509 builders waiting

Want the agent behind these prompts?

These prompts came out of building Trillion. The whole thing is going open-source on GitHub. Drop your email and I'll ping you the moment the repo drops.

◦ Next prompt

Give Your AI Agent a Board of Advisors — Turn Well-Documented Operators Into Seats That Actually Disagree With You, Cite Their Sources, and Refuse to Answer When They Don't Know, in One Session →

Paste this into Claude Code, Cursor, or Aider and it interviews you about the agent you already run — what it can read about your business, how it surfaces things to you, whether it can schedule its own work — then researches each advisor you name, fact-checks that research against itself, and builds the machinery: one markdown dossier per seat holding numbered, citable doctrine; a router that picks who has standing on a given question; a fan-out that gives each seat its own isolated model call so they can genuinely disagree; a citation gate that strips any reference a seat could not have seen; and your own agent as chair, the only participant who has read your actual revenue. Plus abstention as a first-class answer, a unanimity guard that cannot be talked into agreement, blind spots that let the chair discount a seat, and a standing monthly review that puts an agenda in front of you without being asked. Interview first, research second, then build tier by tier — each tier produces something you can run, and the anti-fabrication defenses are built before the first meeting, not after.